http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/00/MiddleSchool_EnglishClass_Chromebooks_PVUSD.JPG/640px-MiddleSchool_EnglishClass_Chromebooks_PVUSD.JPG |
An article written in the NY Times goes to say that schools are spending billions of dollars on technology, but yet there are tons of budget cuts and teacher layoffs and showing little proof that having technology in the classroom is improving basic learning.
Some teachers argue, that although having the technology in some instances is helpful. However, having pen and paper is more personal. "There is a connection between the physical hand on the paper and the words on the page, it's intimate". "But, computers play an important role in helping the students get their ideas down more easily, edit their work so they can see instant improvement, and share it with the class". Other teachers argue that this is the only way to make this generation learn. "They're inundated in 24/7 media, so they expect it".
So, at this point in time there is unfortunately little data that provides proof that integrating technology within the classroom is clearly benefiting students. However, it is almost a must with some things. I feel that it should be up to the teacher individually. There are some things that really just cannot even be completed without the use of technology. It's just important to understand your students and figure out the best way they learn. I also feel that the older the students are, the easier it is to incorporate the use of technology.